The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (one year of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the following facts: (a) the Defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case and against his mistake; (b) there are favorable circumstances for the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case; (c) the damage from each of the crimes of this case was not limited to the injury; and (d) the Defendant agreed with the victims; (c) the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case at once again during the period of repeated crimes of the same kind even though he had been already sentenced several times due to the crime of larceny; and (d) the crime of this case may have been committed by destroying the correction device and intrusion upon the structure; (c) the Defendant’s continued repeating the above crimes; and (d) there is no special change of circumstances to change the sentence of the lower court after the sentence of the lower court was sentenced, and there is no other reason to believe that the Defendant’s assertion is unreasonable by taking into account the Defendant’s assertion, as it is not reasonable.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.