beta
Text
1. The judgment of the first instance, including the claim of the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) expanded by this court, is as follows.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The relationship between the parties 1) the network E (hereinafter “the network”).
A) On November 19, 2015, the Plaintiff et al. died. (2) The Plaintiff et al. was a child between the deceased and the former wife. The Defendant is a spouse who remarriedd around 1999 with the deceased, and the Plaintiff et al. and the Defendant are co-inheritors of the deceased.
B. The deceased’s donation 1) The deceased’s donation 1) No. 201 of the first, third, third, third, third, and second, third, third, third, third, and second, third, third, third, and second, third, third
(2) On October 28, 2015, immediately before the death, the deceased completed the registration of ownership transfer based on donations in the future on October 28, 2015. (2) From April 15, 2015 to May 21, 2015, the deceased transferred the total amount of KRW 154,000,000 from his original water fisheries cooperation account to the Defendant’s name.
C. The deceased’s active and negative property 1) The deceased’s active and active property held at the time of his death is three times, namely, the sum of 1/18 square meters out of KJ large 663 square meters and 1/18 square meters out of L large 514 square meters (hereinafter “K land” and “L land”).
i)motor vehicles and franchise XG M vehicles (hereinafter referred to as “instant vehicle”);
2) After December 1, 2015, the Plaintiff completed the registration of transfer of the instant vehicle on the ground of inheritance transfer on December 1, 2015.
3) At the time of the deceased’s death, the deceased assumed the Defendant’s obligation to borrow KRW 50,00,000 to I. On November 30, 2015, the deceased’s death. D. On July 19, 2016, the Defendant established the right to collateral security with respect to the loan of this case to N on the ground that the Defendant had completed the registration of the establishment of the right to collateral security with respect to the loan of this case to N on July 19, 2016 while the first instance trial was pending, with the maximum debt amount of KRW 40,00,00,00, and the debtor’s establishment of the right to collateral security over the loan of this case to N on the ground that the Defendant did not have any dispute over the establishment of the right to collateral security. 【No evidence Nos. 1 and 2, 3-1, 5-1, 6-1, 9-1, 11-2, 12-1, 3-4, 1-4, and 1-4 evidence No.
2. The summary of the parties' arguments.