logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2018.11.16 2018고단787
특수주거침입등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 특수 주거 침입 피고인은 2018. 6. 29. 15:23 경 전 남 무안군 B에 있는 피해자 C의 주거지에 이르러 미리 준비한 위험한 물건인 노루발 못뽑이를 이용하여 출입문 잠금 장치를 부수고 집안까지 들어가 침입하였다. 2. 특수 재물 손괴 피고인은 제 1 항과 같은 일시, 장소에서 피해자 C 소유인 현관문, TV, 선풍기, 시계, 주택 외등, 트로피, 농장 푯말 등 시가 합계 14,087,500원 상당의 집 기류를 미리 준비한 위험한 물건인 노루발 못뽑이로 때려 부숴 재물을 손괴하였다.

3. On June 29, 2018, at around 16:40 on June 29, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received a report from 112 at the place specified in paragraph (1) of this Article, stating, “The next house is accompanied by a house to enter and depart from the said house”; (b) boarded the police station DNA box at the police station located in the police station, which was called upon request from E during the police officer to voluntarily accompany for the investigation of the instant case; and (c) intending to escape from riot within the police officer and destroy promotion materials carried out by the police officer, and (d) interfere with the legitimate performance of duties by the police officer on one occasion at the face of the police officer on handling the report of 112 case.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F, E, or C;

1. Photographs of damage scene;

1. Application of the police seizure protocol statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Articles 320, 319(1) (a) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment, Articles 369(1), 366 (a), 366 (a), and 136(1) of the Criminal Act (a) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime (a point of interfering with the performance of public duties, a selection of imprisonment with prison labor);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Code for forfeiture is that the defendant was committed by committing a crime, is divided, and the health is not good due to depression, etc., and damage to the victim C.

arrow