logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.10.21 2016구합51225
체류자격변경불허가처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff, a national of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "China"), filed a marriage report with B who is a national of the Republic of Korea, and on May 9, 2007, entered the Republic of Korea as the status of sojourn [Attachment 1] [Attachment 1] [Attachment 2(F-2)] No. 27(a) of the former Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 23274, Nov. 1, 201), and entered the Republic of Korea as the status of sojourn under [Attachment 1] No. 28-4(F-6) Item (a) of the current Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act (hereinafter referred to as "the same status as the "spouse's status of sojourn of a national"] and entered the Republic of Korea as the extension of the period of sojourn, and consulted with B on June 7, 2011.

B. Accordingly, on December 26, 2013, the Defendant changed the Plaintiff’s status of stay to a visiting Dong (F-1) to leave the Republic of Korea after family settlement following a divorce with B on December 26, 2013, and determined the period of stay by June 19, 2014.

C. After completing a marriage report with C on April 30, 2014, the Plaintiff applied for the extension of the sojourn period as the spouse (F-6) status on June 13, 2014. However, the Defendant issued a disposition to refuse the application for extension of sojourn on the ground that there is no authenticity of marriage with C on November 25, 2014 after conducting a fact-finding survey on the change of the status for marriage against the Plaintiff.

On February 16, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against C seeking a divorce and consolation money of KRW 10 million, alleging that the marital relationship with C was broken down due to a cause attributable to C, and thereafter, C filed a counterclaim against the Plaintiff seeking a divorce (Seoul District Court Decision 2015ddan10429 (principal lawsuit), 3382 (Counterclaim), and September 25, 2015). On September 25, 2015, the Plaintiff and C divorced from the Plaintiff on the principal lawsuit on the ground that the marital relationship with C was broken down due to the main cause attributable to C, “A divorce is made by the principal lawsuit, and C pays consolation money of KRW 1 million to the Plaintiff,” and the judgment dismissing C’s counterclaim’s counterclaim was rendered (hereinafter “judgment of divorce”). This was decided on September 25, 2015.

arrow