A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. From March 20, 2013 to April 18, 2013, the Defendant: (a) while working as the victim E’s caregiver at the victim D’s house located in Boan-si from around March 20, 2013 to around April 18, 2013 as the husband of the victim D, the Defendant stolen two bankbooks owned by the victim D; (b) one head of the post office, one seal; and (c) one resident registration certificate and one head of the post office owned by the victim E.

2. The Defendant forged a private document forgery, uttering of a falsified investigation document, and the fraud using the passbook and seal owned by the stolen victim D, as mentioned in the above Paragraph 1, and forged the withdrawn money tag as if he/she had been duly delegated by the victim D, and had the intent to withdraw the deposited money under the victim D’s name.

On March 20, 2013, the Defendant, around 11:54, on March 20, 2013, indicated “F”, “Gu million won”, and “D” in the name column on the account number column in the statement form, using an authorized color pen, on the withdrawal money tag form located in Yacheon-si, Yacheon-do, Hancheon-do, Hancheon-do, Seoul. On March 20, 2013, the Defendant affixed a seal on the victim D owned by the Defendant, who was stolen on his name, as described in the foregoing paragraph (1).

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of money statement in the name of the victim D, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

B. On March 20, 2013, around 11:54, 2013, the Defendant completed the completion of the completion of the completion of the completion of the completion of the completion of the completion of the completion of the completion of the completion of the completion of the construction of the construction of the Agricultural Cooperative, the Agricultural Cooperative, the employee of the victims of Wonsan-do.

(1) as stated in paragraph (1) of this section, the money note in the name of D, and the seal and the passbook (Account Number: F) which were stolen as stated in paragraph (1), were presented.

However, there was no fact that the defendant stolens the passbook and seal owned by D and obtained the consent that the defendant should be released from D, and that the defendant should be released from D.

Nevertheless, the defendant is forged to G of the victim's staff who is aware of the forgery in the same place.