The judgment below

The part against the defendant shall be reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

The defendant above.

1. The sentence of the court below against the defendant in the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the fact that the defendant denied the crime to the court below, and that there is a need to punish perjury in light of the legislative intent of securing the propriety and fairness of the trial procedure, etc., which is disadvantageous to the defendant, or that the defendant recognized and reflects the defendant's criminal act for the first time in the trial. As a result, it appears that the defendant's perjury crime does not affect the conclusion of the criminal case against E. In full view of the equity of punishment with co-defendant A, and other circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing in the instant case, including the defendant's age, character, character, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, the court below's punishment is somewhat somewhat inappropriate, and thus, the defendant and his attorney's above assertion

3. In conclusion, the part of the judgment below against the defendant is reversed pursuant to Article 364 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act as the defendant's appeal is with merit, and it is again decided as follows.

Punishment of the crime

On January 6, 2014, the Defendant was present at the court of Jeonju District Court 25, Jeonjin-gu, Jeonjin-gu, Seoul, as a witness of the robbery No. 2013 High Court No. 177 E, and took an oath after being given a warning of punishment for perjury.