logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2014.02.05 2013고단1017
업무상횡령
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant entered into a labor contract with the Armed Forces Welfare Group for the crime of occupational embezzlement of the sales proceeds of duty-free alcoholic beverages with the victim’s Armed Forces, and from July 201, the Defendant had been working as the occupant at the Cmate affiliated E of the Armed Forces Welfare Group E in Leecheon-si from around July 201.

From July 201 to November 19, 2012, the Defendant sold duty-free alcoholic beverages to the Gun executives over about 40 to 50 times from the above CMart, and received the total sales proceeds in cash equivalent to KRW 20 million and stored for the said victim, the Defendant did not sell them from the electronic computer system (POS) and consumed them for personal purposes, such as living expenses and repayment of debts, etc. around that time.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the victim's property.

2. The Defendant entered into a labor contract with the Korea Armed Forces Welfare Group for the occupational embezzlement of the sale proceeds of the Franc forest, and from around 2006, he/she had been working as a store manager in the Franc E belonging to the Korea Armed Forces Welfare Group E in E in E in E in E in E in E in E in E in E in E in E.

On June 2012, the Defendant, while exercising a military unit in the Franc ward, sold 106 bread ready-mixed 106, 179, 115, 173, 172, 172, cooc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc calc cal

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the prosecutorial statement concerning G;

1. Protocol of each police statement concerning G;

1. A copy of the military warning statement of H;

1. Evidential documents of damages;

1. Report on the result of each transfer and takeover of goods;

1. Transfer and takeover inventory inspections ( November 20, 2012);

1.Each withdrawal/receiving.

arrow