1. Each of the plaintiffs' claims is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is owned by E and F, and the registration of transfer of shares was completed on the wind that the ownership transfer registration of G was completed in the future, the Plaintiffs, the heir of G, and H due to inheritance in the future.

Since then, the plaintiffs reserved liquidation procedures to secure the defendant's 7 million won claim against the plaintiffs, and completed the registration of transfer of shares in this case in the defendant's future, but the defendant did not undergo liquidation procedures.

Therefore, the defendant asserts that the procedure for the cancellation registration of the share transfer in this case should be implemented to the plaintiffs, and that the defendant has a duty to express his/her consent to the recovery registration procedure to recover the share transfer registration unfairly cancelled, such as Paragraph 2 of the claim

B. We examine the judgment, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the transfer registration of the share in this case is the transfer registration of the share for the purpose of security for which the liquidation procedure is reserved;

Therefore, the plaintiffs' assertion based on this premise is without merit.

2. Conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed for lack of reasonable grounds.