1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by each person;

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 19, 2008, the Seongdong-gun Environmental Industry Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff”) obtained permission from the Defendant for diversion of mountainous districts (hereinafter “instant permission”) for the exclusive purpose against the Defendant’s non-furnal of 8-1 and seven parcels (hereinafter “instant land”) of Cheongyang-gun, Cheongyang-gun, Cheongyang-gun, and the period of permission for diversion of mountainous districts for the period of permission from December 31, 2009 (hereinafter “instant permission”).

B. After January 201, 2010, the Plaintiff obtained permission from the Defendant to December 31, 201, including the period of permission from January 201 to December 31, 201, and from January 201 to December 31, 201, the period of permission of this case is extended from January 201 to December 31, 201.

C. On January 2, 2014, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the submission of a mountainous district restoration plan and the issuance of an order to commence restoration work upon the expiration of the permission period of this case. On August 17, 2015 (hereinafter “previous mountainous district restoration plan”), the Plaintiff submitted a mountainous district restoration plan (hereinafter “previous mountainous district restoration plan”) including the content of “to be recovered by using circular sand” from the Plaintiff, and notified the Plaintiff of the measures to complete restoration by December 31, 2015.

On November 17, 2015, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the content that “The circular soil for recovery is not suitable for the growth of trees, so it is deemed appropriate for the growth of trees, so it is deemed to be utilized and filled up as the lower debt source for the sexual land, and the surface is 60 centimeters or more to be suitable for the growth of trees, and the surface is filled up with soil to the effect that it is f0 centimeters or more for the recovery of mountainous districts, such as tree planting, and the base point for the recovery of trees

E. The plaintiff was unable to complete recovery within the period of previous approval.

F. On July 7, 2016, the Defendant issued a reply to the Ministry of Government Legislation on July 6, 2016 to the effect that it is impossible to use circulars for circulars to the Plaintiff in the place of mountainous district restoration work, and that there is a good quality to walk in the circulars used for restoration within the mountainous district restoration work site of the instant land.