The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the judgment of the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). Based on the foregoing legal doctrine, there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared with the original judgment on the grounds that new sentencing materials have not been submitted in the trial after the lower court was sentenced, and the grounds for sentencing alleged by the Defendant seem to be the circumstances that the lower court has already considered in determining the punishment.

In addition, considering the sentencing factors expressed in the proceedings of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive for committing the crime, and circumstances after committing the crime, the sentencing of the lower court does not seem to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion, as it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.