beta
Text
Defendant
A’s Decision 2-
(a) 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor, No. 2 of the holding
(b)two months of imprisonment for a crime;
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant B was sentenced to four years in Seoul High Court on May 27, 2005 to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud), etc. on May 25, 2006, and completed the execution of each of the above punishment on November 10, 2007 at the Jeonju District Court on May 25, 2006. On November 24, 2009, the Jeonju District Court sentenced one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud at the Jeonju District Court on March 31, 2010, which became final and conclusive on February 22, 201, and was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act at the Jeonju District Court on February 22, 201, and was sentenced to four months in imprisonment with prison labor at the Jeonju District Court on November 11, 2011, which became final and conclusive on November 14, 2016.
The defendant was aware of the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (the "Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes" (the "Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes") (the "Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes"), which was a member of the victim
The defendant, as he plans to establish a medical care center from A, needs to have funds of 2 billion won in the above foundation, and listen to a finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and around July 2009, the defendant stated that "I would be able to suspend a guarantee of 2 billion won in finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite fin
However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to get the Credit Guarantee Fund to obtain a guarantee from the victim foundation only when he did not have any person who is aware of the Credit Guarantee Fund and tried to use it for the purpose of personal repayment, etc. even if he received money from A.
Ultimately, the Defendant is the victim as above.