A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 2, 2017, the Defendant thought that police officers working at the Busan Central Police Station C (SJD) Police Station C (SJD) who had returned home under the influence of alcohol before the Busan Central Police Station C (SJD) will perform their duties unfairly, and taken a photograph of inside the police box with a cellular phone, and then “the video is included.”

d. The adoption of evidence: D. D. He/she is requested to return home from E (hereinafter referred to as “Eman”) who was on duty at the place where the glass door (90cc wide, 210cc wide, hereinafter referred to as “the entrance of the mar released from the mar”) was corrected while intending to compulsorily open the glass door (the width of 90cc wide, 210cc long, hereinafter referred to as “the entrance of the mar released from the mar”) in the said box. He/she is requested to return home from E (hereinafter referred to as “the mar”).

“Along with the need to maintain the view of “Absing the front of a police box,” the Defendant had the front door of the police box to walk three times, and had the front door of the police box installed, and if only the charge was read, then the Defendant walked with the front door of the police box, and read it as the front door of the vehicle. However, even after the front door, the door was actually used for a short time, and was used for a short time, and there was any infringement on the Defendant’s exercise of his right to defense by recognizing the criminal facts without changing the indictment.

As can not be seen, it is recognized as the above facts constituting the crime.

부쉈다.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the repair cost of KRW 1,150,000 used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement records on policemen;

1. Application of the investigation report (hereinafter referred to as "investigation report") (hereinafter referred to as "8,9,12"), photographs/cinematographic outputs, estimates, and receipt-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 141 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and the sentencing of Article 62-2(1) [the scope of recommendations] The basic area (from June to one year and six months) (the invalidation of public goods) (the scope of sentences compared to the recommended sentences that there is no person who is subject to special sentencing).