logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.08.12 2015가단4612
임차보증금반환
Text

1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 55,400,000 and KRW 30,000 among them, from June 1, 2015 to the day of full payment.

Reasons

There is no dispute between the parties or recognized by the respective statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including additional numbers), i.e., the plaintiff prepared a lease agreement with the defendant about the "building on the ground of the land of the land of the land of the land of the land of the land of the land of the land of the land of the land of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the Seoul, and paid KRW 30 million to the defendant on July 31, 2007, and the defendant promised to pay the above money and interest as indicated below, and the defendant paid to the plaintiff every six months from November 2008 to April 209.

① The written statement of payment on April 14, 2008 – “The payment is made not later than August 30, 2008. The payment is made not later than 30 million won.” ② The written agreement on September 1, 2008 - the agreement on September 30, 2008 - the payment of the deposit for lease on a monthly basis and the interest thereon shall be made not later than November 600,000 won each month; ③ the promissory note on January 30, 2012 - the promissory note on December 30, 2012 - the payment period of KRW 3 million from the payment date of KRW 3 million until December 20, 2013 to the Plaintiff, and the agreement on the payment of the deposit for lease on a monthly basis from KRW 3 million to KRW 3 million from the payment date of KRW 3 million until December 20, 2012 to the 3 million payment date, barring special circumstances.

In regard to this, the Defendant asserts that the original Defendant’s operation of the medical equipment in the instant case as a partnership business and did not have any obligation to return it as the Plaintiff’s investment amount. Moreover, the Defendant’s letter of payment, agreement, and promissory note, written by the Defendant to the Plaintiff, was written to the Plaintiff by threatening the Defendant using the position D, and that it has no validity.

Doesk, sknife, revocation, or invalidation.

arrow