1. The Defendant made an agreement with the Plaintiff on October 29, 201 with respect to the land size of 576 square meters in Haan-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.

1. Basic facts

A. On August 10, 191, Nonparty D completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the land of 576 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”). On October 2, 2006, Nonparty D completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the land of 576 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”). On October 2, 2006, Nonparty D completed the registration of ownership transfer based on donation on September 29, 2006.

B. On October 7, 2006, D died after having left Nonparty E, the Plaintiff, the Defendant, and Nonparty F, who is a bereaved family member.

C. On December 23, 2010, the Defendant filed a lawsuit (hereinafter “previous lawsuit”) with the Changwon District Court Decision 2010Kadan57896, against the Plaintiff et al. 19 et al., seeking the implementation of the procedure for ownership transfer registration (hereinafter “previous lawsuit”) with respect to 64m2 and 562m2m2 (hereinafter “previous lawsuit land”).

On December 28, 2011, the above court rendered a ruling of recommending reconciliation with respect to the remaining parties except Nonparty I and J on December 28, 201 to the effect that the procedures for ownership transfer registration are implemented with respect to their respective inheritance shares among the land in dispute over the previous lawsuit. On May 29, 2012, the court rendered a ruling of the same purport to I and J (hereinafter “instant decision of recommending reconciliation”) and the above ruling of recommending reconciliation became final and conclusive around that time.

E. On October 29, 2011, the Defendant: (a) given up the land of K, C, L, etc. except G, deposits, and the investments of concentrate cooperatives among the property under the name of a conditional resolution of the case of gold lawsuit to be completely resolved by the Defendant.

(n) The C person’s ownership shall permit access roads to enable access to and construction of vehicles on L;

‘A’ No. 2 of the Convention, hereinafter referred to as the “instant agreement,” is called as the “instant agreement.”

3) The Plaintiff prepared and delivered the document to the Plaintiff. [Grounds for recognition] The Plaintiff did not dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 5, 7, and 8 (including virtual numbers and the purport of the entire pleadings)

2. As to the cause of the claim

A. The plaintiff asserted by the original defendant, subject to the resolution of the previous lawsuit on October 29, 201 by the defendant.