logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.11.26 2013가합8645
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) shall pay to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) KRW 15,421,520 as well as its full payment from May 26, 2013.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff in relation to the parties is a person who engages in shipbuilding and repair business with the trade name of C, and the defendant is a person who engages in vessel rental processing business with the trade name of D, and is a partner in new machinery for a plan for the settlement of disputes.

B. On March 22, 2012, ED/H fire fighting unit construction cost between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with Defendant 1,250,000 Won 11,250,000 from April 13, 2012 to September 31, 31, 2012, FD/H fire fighting unit totaling KRW 17,500,000 GD/H fire fighting uniting KRW 17,500,000 from May 15, 2012 to May 30, 2012 (the Plaintiff entered into a contract with Defendant 1,50,000,000 won HD/H fire fighting uniting KRW 11,50,00,000 from June 15, 2012 to KRW 30,005,005,057,005.

On March 22, 2012, the date of completion of the construction work at the designated place of “Defendant” in the event that the construction work was not completed in the place of the original construction EECK HHK HOUSE gun within the original construction contract (type) and the date of commencement of the construction work at the designated place of “Defendant”: ED/HOO USE fronter on July 31, 2012 (Separate AS work after loading): 11,250,000 won in gold 11,250,000 won (including D/HOUSE fronter on such quantity): 3-1,250,000 won in the main construction information; “Plaintiff” is recognized as “the terms and conditions of the contract” only in the quantity of block firearms elected by the Defendant.

(c) The extension of the contract between “Defendant” and “Plaintiff” may, in relation to the reduction of the quantity on the part of “Defendant” and the performance of construction works on the part of “Plaintiff”, terminate the contract for construction works regardless of the content of Article 3(1), provided that the construction works are not performed by the supervisor on the part of “Defendant” and “Defendant”.

§ 4-1. The progress payment (the cost of construction) shall be paid to the Defendant.

arrow