beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts (applicable for recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 3, evidence 4-2, 3, Gap evidence 5, 6, 9, Eul evidence 1 through 4, the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments);
A. During the period from December 15, 201 to December 22, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) owned the Plaintiff’s land in Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do (hereinafter “Plaintiff-owned land”); (b) between March 28, 201 and December 26, 2012, he/she owned the instant land in sequence 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 401, and 39.56 square meters of the Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do Ga, and single-story housing; and (c) owned the instant land by the Defendant 2, 36,000 square meters among the instant land owned by the Defendant 281 square meters and 26,000 square meters (hereinafter “the instant land owned by the Defendant 26.”).
B. On June 8, 2012, the Defendant installed iron pents (hereinafter “instant pents”) in the part connecting each point of 42,43 as indicated in the separate reference by means of boundary marking between the Defendant’s land and the Gyeonggi-gun, Gyeonggi-gun, and the Plaintiff’s land and 99 square meters (owner Pyeongtaek-gun), and removed the instant pents on September 6, 2013, during which the instant lawsuit was pending.
다. 1) 피고는 원고를 상대로 원고가 적법한 권원 없이 피고 소유 토지 위에 별지 도면 표시 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 1의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 ㈎부분 시멘트블럭조 함석지붕 9㎡ 및 같은 도면 표시 3, 4, 5, 6, 3의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 ㈏부분 나무기둥 함석지붕 12㎡를 소유하면서 사용수익함으로써 그 부분에 해당하는 피고 소유 토지를 불법점유하고 있다는 이유로 위 건물의 철거를 구하는 소(의정부지방법원 2012가단38056 건물등철거 사건, 이하 '이 사건 관련...