All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court (the imprisonment for eight months, the completion of the sexual assault treatment program, the 40 hours, the restrictions on employment of children and juveniles-related institutions, etc. and the disabled welfare facilities-related institutions, etc.) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is highly likely to commit the crime of this case by inducing the victim who is the third grade of the middle school in which the defendant wants to take a photograph model part of the photographic model, suggesting the victim to pay money, inducing the victim to kis, inducing the part of the victim to kis, taking the body of the victim who is short of fucks, etc., and treating the victim sexually, and taking the part of the victim's buckbucks without the victim's consent.

The defendant has yet been aware that the victim is a middle school student and accessed to pay money, and also demanded the victim to receive short a short term of money.

The Defendant’s crime of this case continues to interfere with the formation of a sound sexual values by the victim beyond the extent of making the victim feel a sense of sexual humiliation temporarily;

It seems that it will be a person.

On the other hand, the defendant shows his attitude to recognize and reflect all of his crimes, and there is no criminal record.

The body parts of the taken victim are the parts that can be identified in appearance, and the defendant cannot be seen as having taken the above body parts for the purpose of spreading, and there is little possibility of spreading as long as the taken mobile phone is confiscated.

I would like to say.

The legal representative of the victim and the victim has not been punished for the defendant by agreement with the defendant.

Comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means, consequence, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentencing of the lower court is within the reasonable scope of discretion.