logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.02.28 2018가단112895
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendants jointly and severally agreed with the Plaintiff KRW 38,892,00 and 6% per annum from September 18, 2015 to February 28, 2019.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff is a person who runs the business of processing Cheongba in the trade name of "E".

From April 1, 2005 to January 19, 2014, Defendant B, operating from Gyeonggi-gun Group F, Gyeonggi-do Co., Ltd., “G” (hereinafter “the foregoing business entity”), supplied Cheongbba, which completed the processing process of Cheongba-gun, etc., by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “pre-processing transaction”).

around January 20, 2014, Defendant C established “H”’s mutual clothes processing company (hereinafter “the foregoing business entity”) at the address of G’s place of business, and engaged in the same business as G, while engaging in the same business as G, Defendant C traded with the Plaintiff from around the date of establishment to June 2015.

【Ground of recognition】 Any description of the absence of dispute, Gap Nos. 3 and 4 (including additional numbers)

2. The allegations and judgment of the parties

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the unpaid price for the pre-processing transaction, and based on which the Defendants jointly operated G and H.

In addition, Defendant C had agreed to pay KRW 10 million to Defendant B in return for transfer of business know-how or introduction of transaction partners, but did not jointly operate the business body, and Defendant C did not take over the obligation of processing transaction account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account account

B. The evidence presented by the Plaintiff as to the Plaintiff’s primary argument is as follows: G is jointly conducted by the Defendants.

arrow