Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who is engaged in driving a Frocketing taxi.

At around 05:20 on August 11, 2013, the Defendant proceeded at the speed of 60-70km from the head office of the Gyeongnam Bank to the synthetic road of 365 Do, which is located in the Masan-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si.

At the time, since it is a new wall, and it is a road with a large traffic volume, there is a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the front door and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver of the motor vehicle and accurately manipulating the steering gear.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and did not discover the victim G (50 years of age) who can be flowed in one lane from the front bank of the defendant in Madle, and received the front front part of the defendant's vehicle and the lower part of the front part of the driver's vehicle.

Ultimately, due to the above occupational negligence, the Defendant caused the victim to die with the blood plessis and the blood resistant surgery at the I Hospital located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si around 06:20 on August 11, 2013.

2. Defendant B is a person who is engaged in driving of J 1 ton of cargo.

At the same time and place as Paragraph 1, the Defendant was proceeding at a speed of 40 to 50 km from the side of the headquarters of the Gyeongnam Bank, following one lane behind the rocketing taxi of the above A, at the speed of 40 to 50 km.

At the time, since it is a new wall, and it is a road with a large traffic volume, there is a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the front door and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver of the motor vehicle and accurately manipulating the steering gear.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not discover the victim who was overwork and used in a single lane by the vehicle A due to negligence while neglecting this, and received the vehicle from the defendant at the lower end of the frame and engine room.