The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant recognized the crime and reflected the crime is considered favorable to the sentencing.

However, since narcotics, including marijuana handled by the Defendant, are highly dangerous to harm the health and social safety of the people due to their toxicity, crimes related to math class generally require severe punishment, and the Defendant has been convicted of having been sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor on two occasions because the same crime was committed by the Defendant, respectively, within the scope of the sentencing guidelines, the lower court determined the punishment within the scope of the sentencing guidelines, and taking into account various sentencing conditions such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit.