Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On December 27, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc. in the Daejeon District Court Seosan Branch on May 20, 2014.

When the Defendant was unable to obtain a loan as an unemployed person, the Defendant conspiredd to obtain a loan from the Defendant M&C Co., Ltd. by forging the loan examination documents, such as the certificate of employment, details of financial account transactions, etc., along with a prompt name “loan B, C, and D.”

1. On September 28, 2010, Co., Ltd. forged private documents: (a) around September 28, 2010, at the lending hub office located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Incheon; (b) by means of a computer, the documents appear to have been made as if the documents appear to have been deposited in the Defendant of the G company by stating the contents of “CF, the account number F, the account holder A, the name of deposit holder A, the KRW 1,500,000 on July 30, 2010, and KRW 1,500,000 on the deposit of the G company’s benefits on August 30, 2010.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with B, C, and D, forged a copy of the entry and withdrawal transaction statement in the name of the Nonghyup, which is a private document related to the certificate of fact, for the purpose of uttering.

2. On September 28, 2010, the Defendant, in collusion with B, C, and D, was given a loan at the above office, and was using the forged entry and withdrawal transaction statement by facsimile as if it was duly formed in the manner described in paragraph (1) to employees in the name of B, C, and D who knew of such forgery.

3. On September 28, 2010, as seen above, the fraud B submitted a forged certificate of employment at the above office as if the Defendant had been working in the company G, to the Busan branch, and the Defendant false statement to the effect that “a loan is changed because the Defendant had worked in the G company.”

The defendant, in collusion with B, C, and D, was accused of the victim and loan company around that time.