1. The Defendants indicated in the separate sheet on each of the pertinent real estate in the attached sheet to the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

1) The Plaintiff shall be approximately KRW 58,488.20 square meters (hereinafter “instant improvement zone”) in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

(2) In the case of the Housing Reconstruction Improvement Project (hereinafter “instant Project”)

In order to implement the former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (amended by Act No. 12640, May 21, 2014; hereinafter “former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas”)

The Plaintiff is a housing reconstruction and rearrangement project partnership established pursuant to the Mapo-gu Office’s establishment authorization (hereinafter “instant establishment authorization”) from the head of Mapo-gu on March 28, 2014.

Upon receipt of the registration of incorporation on April 2, 2014, the registration of incorporation was completed, and on May 12, 2015, the establishment of an association was authorized by the head of Mapo-gu Office. 2) The Defendants are the owners of each relevant real estate (land and buildings) indicated in the attached list of real estate located in the instant improvement zone.

Peremptory 1) On May 15, 2015, the Plaintiff urged Defendant B, C, D, E, and F to reply in writing as to whether they agree to the establishment of the association within two months from the date of receipt of the peremptory notice, and if it is deemed that the Plaintiff is deemed not to consent because he/she did not reply within two months from the date of submission or receipt of an explicit intention not to participate in the establishment of the association and did not reply within two months from the date of receipt, the Plaintiff shall exercise the right to demand sale under Article 39 of the former Act and Article 48 (4) of the Act on Ownership and Management of Condominium Buildings (hereinafter “the instant peremptory notice”).

Defendant B, C, D, E, and F sent each of them. Although they received the above peremptory notice on each of the corresponding dates stated in the “date of arrival of the highest notice” in the separate sheet, they did not answer whether they agree to the establishment of the association until two months have passed thereafter. (2) On January 14, 2016, the Plaintiff submitted the instant lawsuit to Defendant G, H, I, and J, accompanied by the instant peremptory notice against Defendant G, H, I, and J.

Defendant G, H, I, and J are attached Table.