A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle with sod motor vehicle B.

On April 1, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 22:50, and led to a three-lane from the apartment park to the view of the members of Ansan-si, a member of Ansan-si, along with a three-lane distance.

Since the road is bended by the left-hand side, the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by accurately manipulating the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this, while waiting at the two-lanes in the future, received the victim C(56 years old)'s wing and 3 Corresponding vehicles from the victim C(56 years old) who had been waiting for the signal at the two-lanes in the future, and had the victim E(42 years old) driving, which was living in the signal waiting in the front.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the victim C, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of medical treatment for a certain period of time that may not be known to the victim C, and inflicted injury on the victim E, such as light dynasium and tensions, etc. in need of cryp treatment for about three weeks, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim G (43) who is the passenger of the fyp vehicle, by causing each injury, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of cypical treatment for about three weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Each police statement made to C, E, I, G, and J;

1. Each general medical certificate, a copy of medical records, etc.;

1. Relevant photographs (in other words, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence adopted and examined by this Court, including the above evidence, and the accident in this case took the Defendant’s 1 damaged vehicle, which was stopped on a sea-going vehicle.