A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

The suspect is a driver of a passenger car to Hegel.

1. On November 06, 2016, the suspect violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driven the vehicle volume at the section of approximately 1.5 kilometers from the street in front of the horizontal distance of the Suwon-gu, Seowon-si to the core of the control place in the same city room, which is located in the same city room, without obtaining the driver's license issued by the local police officers around 09:00 on November 06, 2016.

2. No suspect who has violated the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation shall operate any motor vehicle on the road, which is not covered by mandatory insurance at the same time and place as a person holding the relevant passenger vehicle quantity;

Nevertheless, the vehicle was operated with knowledge that it was not covered by mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiry into mandatory insurance;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries into driving license registers;

1. Relevant Article of the Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 43 of the same Act (unlicensed Driving), Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act, the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act, and the selection of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Sentencing unfavorable reasons for sentencing of concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 [limited to the extent that the punishment is more severe than that imposed by adding up the long-term punishment stipulated in a crime of violating the Guarantee of Compensation for Motor Vehicles Act] of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes: The defendant has the record of having been sentenced to a summary order of KRW 1,000,000 by a fine issued by the court on July 21, 2015 for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act on April 24, 2015.

Nevertheless, the defendant has committed the crime of this case at another time, and it is judged that the risk of recidivism of the defendant is very high in light of the above criminal records and the interval of crimes.

The favorable circumstances: The defendant recognizes the crime of this case and reflects it.