logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.10.28 2016고합486
직권남용권리행사방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

8,463,500 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that the prosecutor does not disadvantage the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defense, some correction or correction was made according to facts obtained through the examination of changes in indictment procedures.

After the Defendant was appointed as the so-called G Army (H), the Defendant served as an executive member of the Defense Acquisition Program Administration from June 7, 201 to November 13, 201; specifically, from November 14, 201 to November 15, 201, the Minister of Justice, from November 16, 201 to April 25, 201, the Minister of Justice, from November 16, 201 to April 25, 201, and from November 30, 201 to December 31, 201, the Defendant served as the Director General from April 26, 201 to November 31, 201, and was discharged from active service as the Director General of the Korea Development Fund, from November 16, 2012 to April 25, 2013 to December 31, 2013 to December 16, 2014.

1. From December 6, 2011 to November 15, 2012, the Defendant, as the Director of the Defense Acquisition Program Administration, took overall charge of N duties.

Meanwhile, in the case of Q (hereinafter “ Q”) under the “New-Type P Bidding in 2012” implemented by the Department of the Defense Acquisition Program Administration under the supervision of the Department of J, it was the minimum price so that Q (hereinafter “P”) was selected as the subject of the first priority examination. On the other hand, R Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “R”) was in fact excluded from the bidding because it was designated as the subject of the second priority examination.

However, around that time, the Defendant received the request from the R representative director S to “S both new type and old type Q, and during that period, the new type continued to be supplied by the low-scar, so that there is no way to do so at least once, I will examine whether it is possible to do so.” The Defendant used pressure to Q to change the new type of P business to R.

Accordingly, on June 4, 2012, the defendant is highly strong in Yongsan-gu Seoul, who is the office of the defendant in the Defense Acquisition Program Administration in 54-99, and asked the defendant whether Q representative director T may be awarded a bid at the same time, and both new and old forms can be supplied.

arrow