logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.10.24 2014고단1599
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months and by a fine not exceeding 150,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving CCA 110 Obane, a motorcycle, in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving).

At around 17:30 on July 1, 2014, the Defendant driven the above Oral Sea without a motorcycle driver's license, and moved the private distance from the White Sea Center, which is located in the Mansan-dong-dong, Seoyang-gu, Goyang-si, Goyang-do, into the right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately operating the steering and steering system, and by accurately operating the steering and steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not properly go through the front door and the left door door door door, and did not go through as it was, so that the Defendant was faced with the left-hand side of the victim D(W, 32 years old) who was in the atmosphere of the signal in order to proceed from the center side to the light, and received it as the front part of the Defendant's Oba car.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer bodily injury, such as fluoral salt, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment by occupational negligence as above.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of measurement) has reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking, smelling, drinking, and drinking, from G at the F District Zone in Yongsan-gu, Goyang-gu, Goyang-si, Goyang-si, the Defendant did not comply with a police officer’s demand for measurement of alcohol without justifiable grounds even though he was required to comply with the demand for measurement of alcohol by inserting the drinking measuring instruments three times in total, on July 1, 2014, around 18:20, around 18:3, and around 18:50, around 18:50.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D;

1. A traffic accident report, a ledger using a drinking measuring instrument, a ledger for driver's license of motor vehicles, and a medical certificate;

1.The application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs which refuse to measure drinking;

arrow