logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.03.26 2014고정714
재물손괴
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is the Dong representative of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment complex C (hereinafter “instant apartment”) and the victim D is the head of the same apartment management office.

1. At around 13:00 on June 27, 2013, the Defendant destroyed the property managed by the victim by removing the public notice of “person of the Chairperson of the Election Management” attached to the instant apartment elevator on its bulletin board on the ground that it causes confusion to the lives of residents.

2. The defendant has committed the same harm;

7. 12. A public notice stating that “the chairperson of the tenant representative group has changed to E” attached to the above bulletin board was removed for the foregoing reasons and damaged the property managed by the victim.

2. The Defendant acknowledged that the written public notice (hereinafter “the written public notice of this case”) was removed at the same date, time, and place as indicated in the facts charged, but asserts that it constitutes a legitimate act and thus the illegality is excluded.

Therefore, the following circumstances acknowledged by the records, i.e., the defendant, who is the legitimate representative of the apartment of this case, denied the status of the defendant and brought about continuous conflicts with the defendant. ② The main contents of the public announcement written in paragraph (1) of the facts charged are as follows: "E is to manage the apartment on behalf of the tenant since the representative of the apartment of this case was changed in the name of the representative of the apartment of this case," and "E is to manage the apartment on behalf of the tenant," and the report of change of the tenant representative who applied for E with respect to E is rejected on the grounds that E does not meet the qualification requirements for the representative of each building and the election commission to elect the representative of each building was not duly organized. ③ The contents of the public announcement written in paragraph (2) of the facts charged are as follows.

arrow