logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.01.22 2014고정1736
식품위생법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

D is the head of the Gwangju metropolitan area of E (ju) who sells miscarriage germs products, other processed food, etc. as multi-level marketing business, and Defendant B and Defendant A are the salespersons of the Gwangju Center.

No one shall make a false or exaggerated advertisement, with respect to the nutritional value, raw materials, ingredients, or uses of foods, etc., with a content that is likely to have efficacy or effect in the prevention and treatment of diseases, or to mislead or confuse drugs or health functional foods, etc.

Nevertheless, from September 1, 2013 to April 14, 2014, the Defendants sold enzyme products and other processed food on the first floor of the F building in Gwangju-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu-si, and sold them to the people visiting these places, “G” (220,00 won/one strawet) and name of the cell size in the place of business, and promotional books, etc. as if they were 0 to 100 years of age, 1.0 parts with a good body size 2.3.0, 3.00 children and the aged, 4.5.0.0.0.0.0.0.000 Maursenal, 1.0.000 Maurine-macurine-urine-urine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants and D

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing transactions;

1. Article 94 (1) 2-2 of the Food Sanitation Act, Article 13 (1) 1 of the same Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for negligence, and the selection of penalties;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or above;

arrow