1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

The plaintiff is the spouse of the deceased B (hereinafter referred to as the "the deceased"), and the deceased died on October 14, 199.

On June 15, 2016, the Plaintiff “the deceased” to the Defendant.

6. 25. At the time of war, the racing police station suffered a prize on the right-hand bridge by participating in the scopic combat of the Nakdong River while serving in the police station;

“An application for the registration of bereaved family members of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State” was filed on November 9, 2016, and the Defendant did not have any grounds to recognize the difference of deceased persons.

“A person who rendered distinguished services to the State and was not eligible for veteran’s compensation. The Plaintiff again rendered a decision on April 6, 2017 to the Defendant “the deceased”.

6. 25. At the time of war, the racing police station participated in the scopic combat of the Nakdongdong police station, resulting in a wound on the right-hand bridge, while serving at the Seodaemun Police Station in Seoul, and went back to the right-hand bridge;

“A person who has rendered distinguished services to the State” has filed an application for registration as a bereaved family member, and the Defendant on August 25, 2017 has no basis to recognize the difference of the deceased.

"A person who has rendered distinguished services to the State or a person eligible for veteran's compensation for reasons (hereinafter "the disposition in this case"). [The grounds for recognition] did not dispute. The plaintiff's assertion as to the legitimacy of the disposition in this case as to Gap's evidence Nos. 2, 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 6 (including each number), and the whole purport of the pleading, and the whole purport of the pleading. The plaintiff's assertion was made from November 1, 1948 as a soldier or police officer, who was employed as a policeman at the racing Police Station and was in total on the right bridge on the right-hand bridge around September 1950, and accordingly, the plaintiff, a spouse of the deceased, should be recognized as a bereaved family member of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State. Thus, Article 4 (1) 4 of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State, having been discharged from military service or having retired from military service due to a wound during combat or in the line of duty.