1. The Defendant’s KRW 92,50,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from October 8, 2015 to November 3, 2015.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 26, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into an exchange contract with the Defendant on May 26, 2014 with the Plaintiff, setting the difference between the exchange difference between the instant apartment and the instant apartment and the instant apartment as KRW 482,00,000,000, in exchange for the exchange difference between the Defendant and the instant apartment and the instant apartment and the instant apartment, by setting the exchange difference between KRW 502,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, or0, in the case of the instant apartment and the instant apartment and the instant apartment, to the Plaintiff on May 26, 2014 (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

B. The Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on the apartment of this case under the name of the Defendant to secure the remainder of the purchase price due to the shortage of the purchase price, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the apartment of this case under the name of the Defendant, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the remainder of the maximum debt amount, the obligor, the Defendant, and the Plaintiff, the

C. The Plaintiff, upon cancelling the registration of the instant senior mortgage from the Defendant, made the registration of the instant apartment, and completed the registration of the establishment of a neighboring mortgage to a financial institution, agreed to obtain a loan that KRW 152,500,000 out of the remainder of the remainder of the remainder of the loan will be made again on the instant apartment in order to secure the remainder of the remainder of the remainder of the loan.

However, on September 15, 2014, the Defendant completed the registration of establishment of a neighboring mortgage (hereinafter referred to as the “mortgage-mortgage-backed mortgage bank”) which is the Seoul Central District Court’s registry office, the maximum debt amount of KRW 884,000,000,000, and the debtor, the creditor, the creditor joint savings bank, and the creditor joint savings bank, on the apartment of this case, paid KRW 150,000 out of the borrowed money, but failed to execute the agreement at the same time with the Plaintiff’s name on the registration of establishment of a neighboring mortgage of the second-class neighborhood.