logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원원주지원 2014.03.05 2013가단6000
부당이득금반환등
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff is a company that manufactures and supplies the hump air boiler with the Defendant Company, and the Defendant Company (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) entered into an agency contract with the Defendant Company for the sale and follow-up management of boilers, and the Plaintiff is a company that sells and installs the air heat boiler produced by the Defendant Company with the name of “F”.

The Plaintiff was using a general gas boiler while operating the instant her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

Defendant B, around September 10, 2012, set up the air heat boiler (hereinafter “instant boiler”) in the instant Moel, and the Plaintiff paid the installation price in full.

(4,926,267 won of the total principal and interest that the Plaintiff borne by using a credit card to pay in 36 months if the Plaintiff was to include the interest accrued therefrom). Afterwards, upon Defendant B’s recommendation, the Plaintiff installed the electric locker with an auxiliary device of the boiler of this case and started to operate the boiler of this case on October 8, 2012, with an additional device of KRW 5,600,000 of the price, and the e-16’s sign "E-16" caused a problem that the shuter fell repeatedly and the shuter fell.

In addition, the electricity charge applied to the electricity charge, which was average of 2.5 million won per month before installing the boiler of this case, increased to 490 million won on December 2012 and 670 only on January 2013.

The Plaintiff’s electric charges were excessive and defective in boilers. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s instant case against the Defendants.

arrow