A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On August 29, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and six months in Seoul Southern District Court for fraud, etc., and completed the execution of the above punishment on May 27, 2015.

around 13:00 on March 9, 2016, the Defendant, “E” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul on March 9, 2016, is promoting the Victim F to acquire the other unsold e-mail apartment.

If a loan of KRW 30 million is lent, the office is leased with the money, the corporation is also established, and the business is promoted, and the G Chairperson has made an entry of KRW 300 million per day by investing in the business, and the above KRW 300 million enters.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false representation.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was planned to receive money from the injured party to use it as personal debt, living expenses, entertainment expenses, etc., and there was no fact that 300 million won was to receive investment. Therefore, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to repay the above money even if it was borrowed from the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 27 million won from the victim, who was in his or her custody.

"2016 Highest 9197"

1. At the end of January 2016, the Defendant had the outstanding amount that the Defendant would have to receive from the president of the I sexual intercourse and the J president while she had her fly flyed with the victim H, in front of the sexual intercourse in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, and 34 o-gil 2.

"A defect, the victim's "The Secretary General of the K Attorney-at-Law Office," and the outstanding amount is a method of receiving civil litigation, and will receive money by proceeding civil litigation and depositing deposit money.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false representation.”

However, the defendant did not have the ability to request the attorney-at-law to proceed with a lawsuit in the state where he was in charge of the attorney-at-law's office affairs at the time, and he thought to use the above money due to personal living expenses, so even if he received the money from the injured party under the pretext of recognition, the lawsuit is