1. Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

2. The Defendants did not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name "D" in the Daegu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City C3 level, and Defendant B transferred the above business establishment to A on December 2014 and received monthly pay from A after receiving boarding and lodging in the above business establishment, and operates employment management of employees of sexual traffic, provides guidance to customers, or provides them with no employees of sexual traffic.

around February 2016, the Defendants received 120,000 won from male customers with no name, and caused E, an employee of sexual traffic, to engage in the similar acts. From the end of December 2014 to February 15, 2016, from around February 25, 2016 to April 27, 2016, the Defendants employed F, E, etc. from the above “D” as an employee, and had F, etc. receive 120,000 won as the price for sexual traffic from many unspecified male customers at the said sexual traffic business establishment to the end of February 25, 2016.

As a result, Defendants conspired to act as a broker for commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against G, E, or F;

1. A H statement;

1. A protocol of seizure, a list of seizure, a voluntary submission, and a waiver of ownership;

1. A real estate lease contract and on-site control photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (No. 7, 13, 14, 26)

1. Relevant Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Arranging of sexual traffic, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act - favorable circumstances: All of the Defendants; Defendant A did not have the same criminal record; Defendant B did not have the same criminal record; Defendant B did not have any criminal record other than a fine; Defendant A did not have the same criminal record, but did not have the same kind of suspended sentence.