logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원파주시법원 2020.02.27 2019가단93
청구이의
Text

1. The plaintiff A's claim is dismissed.

2. The defendant's High Government District Court of the Republic of Korea against the plaintiff B is the High Government Court of the Republic of Korea.

Reasons

1. The Defendant’s claim against the Plaintiff A is not indicated in the list of individual rehabilitation creditors, thus, the Plaintiff A is not exempt from its liability pursuant to the proviso to Article 625(2) and 1 of the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act.

(B) On February 1, 200, Plaintiff B was exempt from liability pursuant to the main sentence of Article 566 of the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act, since Plaintiff B was unaware of the existence of the instant claim against the said Plaintiff, and the fact that Plaintiff B did not enter the instant claim in the creditor list was not aware of the existence of the instant claim against the said Plaintiff.

arrow