logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.09.29 2020고단2047
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 23, 2020, the Defendant posted the comments, such as “I am on the galthical galthical galthical galthical galthical c and D, which is one’s own residence, by the victim F, to purchase the galthal galthical galthical galthical c and D,” and “I am on the galthic galthic galthic galthic galthic galthic galthic galthic galthic galthic galthic galthic galthic galthic gals.”

However, even if the defendant did not have gallon justy jumopon at the time and received money from the victim as the purchase price, he did not have an intention or ability to sell gallon jus jumopon to the victim.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 200,00 from the victim to G account in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

around February 8, 2020, the Defendant posted a letter stating that he sells cultural products rights on the Internet E at the Seoul Fransh District (Seoul) around February 8, 2020, and falsely read the victim H who reported and contacted the letter as “to send money to the owner of the cultural products.”

However, the defendant did not have cultural products rights, and it was thought that he received the price from the victim and used it as living expenses.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 180,000 won from the victim to the I Bank account (J) in the name of the Defendant on the same day, and acquired the total of 527,300 won from the victims on three occasions from February 7, 2020 to March 11, 2020, such as the list of crimes (six pages).

On March 5, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 20:01 on March 5, 2020, at the “L” store located in Daejeon K, and (b) even if having received money, there was no thought to sell cultural products rights, etc.; (c) on the M website, the Defendant posted a false letter stating that cultural products rights are sold; and (d) on the part of the victim N, who had contacted with the Defendant, 90,000 won as the price for merchandise coupons.

arrow