logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2013.07.04 2013고정245
사문서위조등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 750,000.

If the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was a person who opened and operated a G pharmacy in the name of pharmacist F on the first floor of Pyeongtaek-si DL E, and Defendant B was a person who worked at the above pharmacy as an employee and is the husband and wife of the Defendants.

The Defendants asserted that F, the nominal owner of the above pharmacy, was the actual operator, and thus, was unable to withdraw money from the above passbook on the wind of changing the password of the passbook in the name of F, in which the credit card payment of the medicine sold by the Defendants and the pharmacy was deposited, the Defendants conspired to make the registration of the health functional food sales business in the name of Defendant B, using the forged real estate lease agreement as if the F leased part of the above pharmacy to use the pharmacy’s profits, and to change the name of the card terminal.

1. On October 6, 201, the Defendants: (a) had H, who is well aware of the fact, enter “part of the part within the pharmacy”, “13.2 square meters”, and “0 million won” in the deposit column in the column for the location of the site for the real estate lease contract; (b) had H enter “F” in the column for the location of the site for the real estate lease contract; and (c) had I know of the fact that he had I enter “F” in the column for the size, “13.2 square meters (4 square meters)”, and “this million won” in the column for the deposit; and (d) affix F seal that he had kept in advance on the name of the lessor.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to forge a real estate lease agreement in the name of F, a private document on rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering.

2. On October 12, 2011, Defendant B issued the forged real estate lease agreement as if it was duly formed as above to the employees under the name-free circumstances, who had no knowledge of the forgery at Pyeongtaek-dong 90-6 Pyeongtaek-dong, and registered the business.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to do so, real estate as a falsified document.

arrow