1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the plaintiff succeeding intervenor are dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's successor who was expanded in the trial of the political party.

1. The reasoning for the court of first instance’s explanation on the instant case is that the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s assertion that the instant accident occurred due to the defects of the instant vehicle, which were additionally submitted by the court of first instance, is insufficient to admit the Plaintiff’s and the Plaintiff’s Intervenor’s assertion, and the Plaintiff’s Intervenor extended the purport of the claim on the ground that “6,579,030 won” in Part 3, 14 of the judgment of first instance as “7,796,820 won” was paid additionally to the Plaintiff after the pronouncement of the judgment of first instance.

In addition, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the statement, and it is accepted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Thus, the respective claims of the plaintiff and the plaintiff succeeding intervenor in this case are dismissed as they are without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just and consistent with this conclusion. Thus, the appeal of the plaintiff and the plaintiff succeeding intervenor and the plaintiff succeeding intervenor's claims expanded in the trial of the court of first instance are dismissed as they are without merit, and they are so decided as per Disposition.