1. The Defendant’s corrective order and penalty surcharge payment order issued against the Plaintiff by Resolution No. 2015-327, Sept. 22, 2015, is attached.

. The amount of the violation of the subcontract price (A) in the notice of application of the period of the violation is above 1.C.

1)(a) interest in arrears 29,00 won and 29,000 won for bill substitution 392,775,000 won (including value-added tax) and value-added tax is excluded. (B) Violation Ratio (B/A) 1, 2013 x 46, 947, 933 54, 130.11% on May 22, 2013 30, 2013-13, 133, 672, 3209, 329, 329, 3860, 200, 204, 206, 30,000 won x 40,000 won x 20,000 won x 40,000 won x 20,000 won 5,000 won x 36,040,000 won x 204.28.27.

IV. 2.c.

Pursuant to this, the Plaintiff voluntarily corrected 40% prior to the commencement report of this case, and the three guidelines are operated, so 15% shall be reduced, and the penalty surcharge notice shall be given.

IV. 2.e.

The notice of penalty surcharges IV.2.e.

In any of the following cases, the amount shall be deemed the adjusted amount based on an act or an element of the actor:

(1) If the violation was voluntarily corrected before the date of deliberation, the case

(a) through (c);

(1) If the amount calculated by the Corporation exceeds three times the amount of the violation: If it is claimed for the calculation criteria by applying three times the amount of the violation, it shall be as follows:

Table 7 (Units: : 178-43, 938, 58 △△△ 522, 531 178, 629 178, 629 178, 2013-18, 8,020, 327 △△ 55%, 609, 147 1,086, 9731, 086, 973 1, 086, 973, 973 Da 973, 973.