logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.04.20 2015가단203758
손해배상(자)
Text

1.(a)

The defendant Samsung Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. is the plaintiff A with KRW 6,576,410 and this from May 15, 2014.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. On May 15, 2014, Plaintiff A, while driving a C vehicle at around 02:10 on May 15, 2014 and making a left-hand turn at the left-hand turn at the center of the Geum-gu Office located in Busan as the center of the Geum-gu Office, the Plaintiff A was shocked on the F vehicle owned by D, who was directly driven by the D, in violation of the signal from the right-hand side of the proceeding direction, to the left-hand turn.

(B) In the instant accident, Plaintiff A suffered respectively injury on the sofcalled “the instant accident”). (B) the Plaintiff suffered from the softening and loss of the scrap metal products, the scopic and scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scophers of mouth and mouth, brain-dead sugar, scopic and tensions, scopic scopic s

(C) Plaintiff B is the denial of Plaintiff A.

The Defendant Samsung Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Samsung Fire”) concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Defendant Samsung Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Samsung Fire”) containing a couple’s limited agreement with the Defendant Samsung Fire.

Defendant M&C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant M&C”) is an insurer who has entered into an automobile driving insurance contract with G agency driving company which is the user of the instant L/C, the driver of the instant L/C, and the automobile insurance company which has entered into an automobile driving insurance contract with the automobile insurance company exceeding Class I.

[Reasons for Recognition] Fact-finding, Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul's evidence Nos. 1, Eul's evidence Nos. 1, Eul's evidence Nos. 1 and 1 through 3, and the whole purport of the argument (2) of the judgment as to the above facts of recognition, since the plaintiff's Maritime Vehicle is admitted to a limited driving agreement for the limited driving of the married couple, which is not a driver designated under the special agreement, is liable for damages only to the extent stipulated in the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, which is the scope of compensation I for the large damages under the terms and conditions. Thus, the defendant Samsung F&M is liable for damages to the plaintiffs of the accident of this case, unless there are special circumstances.

arrow