Attached Form 1, 200,000 won for the crimes listed in the attached list No. 1, 200,000 for the defendant's judgment.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On December 8, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny in the Seoul Central District Court for six months, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 16, 2016.

【Criminal facts” around October 5, 2016: (a) around 14:03, the Defendant: (b) committed a theft with 4 primary tin craft goods, such as Rhodros (Rhodrose, flue stone), and scambing, which were displayed in the store by using a gap in the surveillance of employees in E stores operated by the victim D in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu Seoul, with a total market value of KRW 900,00,000, total market value of the victim owned by the victim; and (c) committed a theft with 2,824,000,000 won in total, from the above E stores until June 7, 2017, as indicated in the list of crimes, from the time to June 37, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Investigation reports (the currency of a person in charge of a welfare card) and investigation reports (the confirmation of damaged articles);

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Photographss and photographs of each seized article after the closure of each at-site CCTV image;

1. Previous records: Inquiry into criminal records, report on investigation (report attached to the judgment and other related documents), and application of each Act and subordinate statutes of the same military records;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Determination of a fine for larceny as stated in No. 1 and No. 2 of the list of offenses to which the choice of punishment is attached, and the punishment of imprisonment for larceny as stated in No. 3 through 5 of the list of offenses in the annexed crimes shall be sentenced respectively;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant commits the larceny at the same time during the period of suspension of execution, and that there are records of having been punished several times for the same crime.

However, the amount of damage is not so significant;