Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, by a fine of 5,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the owner of a sexual traffic business in the name of "D" in Seocho-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City C 405, 1119, and 1319, and Defendant B is the male employee of the above business.

From April 9, 2015 to April 14, 2015, Defendants conspired to allow female employees, such as B, to engage in sexual intercourse with unspecified male customers, such as E, in the trade name "D," and arranged sexual intercourse by receiving KRW 8-150,00 per capita from the above male customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol concerning E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on search and seizure records, list of seizure, red sea images, etc., and applicable to field photographs;

1. The Defendants of relevant criminal facts: Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Selection of imprisonment

B. Defendant B: Selection of fine

1. Defendant B of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A who is subject to suspended execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as “Chocks favorable to the following sentencing grounds”);

1. Defendant A: Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. Defendant A: Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic [the grounds for calculation: (a) [the average of at least three times a day from April 9, 2015 to April 13, 2015]x (45,00 won = at least 80,000 won - Amount of at least 35,000 won paid to employees of sexual traffic, on April 14, 2015]x (45,00 won per day on April 14, 2015) (the grounds for sentencing of at least 35,00 won paid to employees of sexual traffic;

1. Defendant A [the determination of types] The scope of recommendations; Defendant A [the determination of types] the sexual traffic crime group; the sexual traffic crime subject to the age of 19 or older; and the brokerage, etc. (the two types) (the special person) (the scope of recommendations] (the scope of recommendations] from June to April (the basic area);

2. The Defendants are not aware of the fact that they had been punished for the same kind of crime and do not commit the instant crime.