logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2016.11.25 2016고단651
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) and the Defendant C (the probation office’s conditional suspension of indictment on August 30, 2016) remainder.

C On June 27, 2016, around 04:00, around 04:00, the victim FF (23 years of age) coming from the PC to the PC bank in order to walk her friendship in front of E convenience points in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, in consideration of the fact that the victim FF (23 years of age) her frights the defendant, her frights the defendant, and her frights the victim's frights the frights of the victim, her frights the victim's frights of 5 to 6 times, and her frights the victim's frights the frights of the victim, and

As a result, the defendant jointly with C, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim.

2. On June 27, 2016, at around 04:25, the Defendant committed an obstruction of performance of official duties, at the place indicated in paragraph (1), and at around 04:25, four police officers, including slope H, who were dispatched after receiving a report of the assault, take over C as a flagrant offender of the said assault case and take over C as a flagrant offender of the said assault case, and there was a defect in carrying it into the patrol vehicle, and the said slope H expressed the desire to “feasible feas.” In addition, it was difficult for the Defendant to avoid disturbance with C along with C.

Therefore, as a slope H saw his cell phone on his hand in order to show the defendant's above behavior, the defendant saw the cell phone on his hand, and the defendant saw the cell phone on his hand so that the cell phone can be cut off to the floor.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to H and F;

1. Each investigation report, on-site photographs, CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article 2(2)3 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 2(2)3 of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under the Criminal Act;

arrow