(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.12.14 2017고단7593

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.12.14 2017고단7593

상해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 2, 2017, at around 13:40 on September 2, 2017, the Defendant, on the ground that the Victim E (F and monetary issues are disputed about the victim E’s own friendship, and that he does not take out and unleash the F’s arms, brought about the victim’s face, spitfing the victim’s satch, fating the victim’s fat with left hand, cut off the victim’s fat, let the victim go beyond the floor, and got the victim go beyond the floor, and caused the victim to inflict an injury, such as double fating fat, and closing the fat at least 42 days of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A E-document;

1. A investigation report (building of on-site CCTV), on-site CCTV photographs, etc.;

1. Investigation reports, victims, on-site photographs, etc.;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, grounds for sentencing of sentence of imprisonment, and grounds for sentencing;

1. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [the scope of the recommended sentence] general injury to the basic area (from April to June) (the basic area (from January to June) (the person who is subject to special sentencing)

2. Determination of sentence: (a) the fact that the Defendant suffered serious injury to the victim due to the instant crime; (b) the Defendant had a record of criminal punishment around 14 times (including the records of being punished six times due to violent crimes, etc.; (c) the injury recovery or agreement was not reached; and (d) whether there was an intent to recover damage based on serious reflectivity, etc.; (b) the fact that there is also doubt as to whether there was an intention to recover damage; (c) the time of the instant crime; (d) the Defendant did not completely endeavor to recover damage; and (d) the fact that the Defendant applied for perusal of the personal information of the victim for the recovery of damage; and (e) appears to have committed contingent crimes in the course of the victim’s vision, considering favorable circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, motive and background, and circumstances after the crime, etc., as indicated in the disposition of sentence.

참조조문

-형법 제257조 제1항

유사 판례

-창원지방법원 밀양지원 2018.11.01 2018고단233

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.09.13 2017고단1984

-인천지방법원 2021.02.25 2020고단10951

-의정부지방법원 2016.01.29 2015노3233

-대구지방법원 2017.10.26 2017고단3269