Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. Plaintiff’s business takeover 1) around September 2015, the Plaintiff acquired the following waste disposal business (i.e., “D” from B to B, and reported on September 18, 2015 to the competent Mayor of Ansan-si on the succession of rights and obligations arising from the business takeover. The purpose or method of recycling: Food waste recycling facility disposal - Food waste, food waste, animal and plant residues recycling products, etc.: self-production 2) as a result of the business takeover, the Plaintiff succeeded to the lessee status of the lease agreement on the whole building (including wastewater treatment plants; hereinafter referred to as “the instant farm building”).
B. From December 11, 2015 to December 27, 2015, the Plaintiff was convicted of 8 months of imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Waste Management Act from D to December 3, 2011, and then disposed of the instant farm building by mixing it with fire fighting fields located therein, and by the same method as food wastes of 2,707 tons in total from around that time to June 2016. 2) The Plaintiff was indicted on August 13, 2016 as charges of violation of the Waste Management Act from the aforementioned court’s imprisonment with labor for not more than 321 tons, and the aforementioned conviction was finalized on April 3, 2017 by the Seoul District Court (Seoul District Court Decision 2016No3716, Jan. 16, 2017; 2017No37164, Apr. 16, 2017).
Title: Administrative disposition (measures Order) due to a violation of the Wastes Control Act.
2. Within the buildings of the E Daily F stable, in the ethic of food waste (2,707 tons).