beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Defendants, between the Plaintiff and the couple, are multi-level sales clerks, who purchase and sell “Crobro Hu23” (hereinafter “Crobro Mabro Ba”), which is a health auxiliary beverage imported in Canada by D (hereinafter “D”) from D.
B. On December 17, 2012, the Plaintiff supplied the Defendants with 30 ambrobea 30 ambro (270,000 won per 1 ambro 270,000 won) that was purchased and kept by the Plaintiff from D, and paid the price for the said goods by the end of May 2013.
‘A letter of confirmation has been issued.’
C. From December 19, 2012 to March 22, 2013, the Plaintiff supplied the Defendants 23 ambrosia (270,000 won per 1 domicile) additionally.
【In the absence of dispute over the grounds for recognition, entry of evidence Nos. 4, 5-1, 3, and 6 in the evidence No. 5-1, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the facts found in the determination as to the cause of the claim, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 14,310,00 (53 ambroasia x 270,000) and damages for delay, except in extenuating circumstances.
[Plaintiff’s assertion that from July 30, 2012, the price per 1,324,000 won for the 17,172,000 won for the goods (53 ambropia x 324,00 won) was raised by ambro 17,172,00 won for the goods, but it is insufficient to recognize that the entries in the evidence No. 8 of ambro 1,00 won for the ambro 1,00 won were raised by ambro 324,00 won from July 30, 2012, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.
A. The Defendants asserted, instead of performing the obligation against the Plaintiff to pay for the above goods, provided the Plaintiff with 5 functional clothes equivalent to KRW 6,000,000, and 6,350,000, functional clothes equivalent to KRW 15,000, and 6,000, 370,000, respectively, to the Plaintiff, and transferred the Plaintiff’s claim for the price for goods equivalent to KRW 270,00,000 against the F that operates the cosmetic.