logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2013.06.04 2012고단1343
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is innocent.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged in this case is as follows: around August 24, 1994, around 6:52, 1994 with respect to the Defendant’s duties, the Defendant’s employee C violated the restriction on vehicle operation of the road management authority by loading and operating the freight to exceed the limit on D vehicle operation in front of the road driving line 420.1km prior to the south Sea Line of the North Sea Line of the Korea Highway.

However, Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545 of Mar. 10, 1993, and amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995) which is the applicable provisions of the above facts charged retroactively loses its effect according to the Constitutional Court's decision of unconstitutionality on Dec. 29, 201.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow