logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2017.10.18 2017가단101568
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B: (a) the buildings listed in paragraph 1 of the attached list;

B. Defendant C shall be listed in [Attachment] Section 2.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is, during Ansan-si, the Housing Redevelopment Development and Improvement Project Cooperatives (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) under the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) for the purpose of housing redevelopment improvement project for the size of 185,269 square meters of the FF KRW 185,269.3 square meters of the Gu in Ansan-si, for which the Plaintiff obtained authorization to establish an association from the Gyeyang-si City on May 2

B. Defendant B owned the aggregate buildings listed in the attached list No. 1, Defendant C owned the aggregate buildings listed in the attached list No. 2, Defendant D owned the aggregate buildings listed in the attached list No. 3, Defendant E owned the aggregate buildings listed in the attached list No. 4, and each of the above aggregate buildings is within the project implementation district, and the Defendants did not apply for parcelling-out to the Plaintiff.

C. On June 2, 2015, the Plaintiff obtained authorization for the implementation of a housing redevelopment project (hereinafter “instant redevelopment project”) from the Ansan market, and announced the same date. On April 22, 2016, the Plaintiff publicly announced the management and disposal plan on the same day after receiving the authorization for the management and disposal plan.

On January 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for adjudication of expropriation to compensate for losses with the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal. On June 12, 2017, the Gyeonggi-do Local Land Tribunal rendered a ruling of expropriation on July 27, 2017.

E. On July 17, 2017, prior to the date of commencement of expropriation, the Plaintiff deposited KRW 265,90,000 for Defendant B, KRW 260,150,00 for Defendant C, KRW 267,550,00 for Defendant D, and KRW 204,200 for Defendant E, respectively.

F. The Defendants are occupying each aggregate building listed in the attached list until now.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 13 (including provisional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. When an approval of the management and disposal plan provided for in Article 49 (3) of the Act on the Determination of Grounds for Claims is publicly notified, owners, superficies, persons holding superficies, leasers, etc. for the previous land or buildings pursuant to paragraph (6) of the same Article.

arrow