A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, while working as an employee of the E branch of the New Daily Lone Star located in 750, Hanam-si, and was involved in the selection, etc. of the internal human subjects and non-electric suppliers. The Defendant became aware of the activities related to the victim G operating the “F”, the victim B operating the “H”, the non-electric suppliers, and the above Lone Star located in the Republic of Korea.

1. On July 5, 2016, the Defendant against the victim G calls the victim G at the Defendant’s residence located in Namyang-ju I to repay the down payment to the victim G within 20 days from the lease of the said contract deposit.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the defendant borrowed money from the damaged person to use it for the repayment of the existing debt, and there was no intention to use it as the apartment contract deposit.

In addition, the Defendant had no intention or ability to pay the interest within the agreed period, even if he borrowed the money from the injured party, since the Defendant had failed to pay the interest amounting to KRW 160,000 and KRW 35,000,000,000 without any special property.

Defendant deceiving the victim as above and received KRW 15,000,000 from the injured party as the borrowed money on July 5, 2016, as well as from around that time to February 20, 2017, the Defendant deceiving the victim by means of the same manner as stated in the attached Table Nos. 1 to 4, a total of four occasions between that time, and obtained the delivery of KRW 75,000,000 in total from the injured party.

2. The criminal defendant against the victim B, around December 23, 2016, against the victim B, he/she would have repaid the purchase of the new apartment to the victim B within four (4) days from the point south of the New World Lone Star (ju) Doz.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the defendant lent money from the damaged person to use it for the repayment of the existing debt.