The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable, for six months of imprisonment imposed by the defendant.

2. Circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the agreement between the victim F and the passengers of the damaged vehicle including the victim F, and the subscription to a comprehensive insurance policy.

However, the Defendant was punished by a fine for 202, 204, and 2006 due to drinking without a license for driving alcohol in 2008, and was punished by a fine for 2008 due to driving without a license for driving alcohol in 0.185%, and was punished by imprisonment with prison labor for 1 year and 2 weeks due to a crime committed by a pedestrian shocking about 0.185% of the blood alcohol content while driving without a license for driving alcohol in 2002, and was sentenced to a punishment for 1 year and 2 year of suspended sentence on December 11, 203 (final confirmation of December 19, 2013), despite the fact that the Defendant was sentenced to a punishment for 1 month in 2003, even if the Defendant was sentenced to a sentence for 0.20% in 20% of the blood alcohol content of the damaged vehicle, the lower court’s sentencing guidelines and the scope of oral proceedings are unreasonable, taking into account the following circumstances:

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.