A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 2, 2017, the Defendant was asked about personal matters from E in the Jeju Dong Police Station D District Unit of the Jeju Police Station D, where the Defendant had been locked at the entrance of the public entertainment bar B on March 2, 2017, “I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see.

This dogpers. Bashes. Bashes

“ Meeting” and making two times a part of the above E’s co-mail in drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted a police officer who was performing legitimate duties concerning the handling of 112 reports, thereby hindering the performance of official duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of E and F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act (within the scope of recommended sentencing guidelines) for observing protection and providing community service orders;

1. Application of the sentencing criteria [Scope of the recommended punishment] and interference with the execution of public duties: The basic area (fence of the performance of public duties and coercion of the performance of duties).

2. Determination of sentence - Determination of favorable circumstances: Determination of sentence - Determination of sentence - Unfavorable circumstances, such as the recognition of crimes, reflectivity, the same kind of criminal records and the fact that there is no record of punishment exceeding fine - Unfavorable circumstances: Determination of sentence as ordered by comprehensively considering all the factors of sentencing that can be known by the records of this case, such as the above circumstances and the defendant's age, sex, family relationship, health status, etc.